The Revelation of John has long confused and disturbed readers. The Apocalypse of John among Its Critics confronts the book's difficulties. Leading experts in Revelation wrestle honestly with a question raised by critics:

• Should John's Apocalypse be in the canon? (Alan S. Bandy)
• Was John intentionally confusing? (Ian Paul)
• Was John a bully? (Alexander E. Stewart)
• Did John delight in violence? (Dana M. Harris)
• Was John a chauvinist? (Külli Tõniste)
• Was John intolerant to others? (Michael Naylor)
• Was John antisemitic? (Rob Dalrymple)
• Did John make things up about the future? (Dave Mathewson)
• Did John advocate political subversion? (Mark Wilson)
• Did John misuse the Old Testament? (G.K. Beale)

Engaging deeply with Revelation's difficulties helps the reader understand the book's message--and respond rightly. The book of Revelation does not need to be avoided or suppressed. It contains words of life.